The Things my Parents Said

Jay and I were, shall we say, far from effusive in public before we were married.

Mom said she wouldn’t have guessed we were that close to a proposal if I hadn’t been agonizing to her about my indecision.

So when Jay called the Saturday before Mother’s Day to ask if there were a time he could talk with my dad when I wasn’t around, well, she felt the need to give Dad a heads-up about what was coming.

She and I were out plant shopping for our garden when Jay asked my dad’s permission to propose.  Jay told me later the first thing my dad said was, “What do you think her answer will be?”

The next day my brother asked if I’d invited Jay to our Mother’s Day dinner.  Jay had told me the night before about his conversation with Dad, and I’d gotten all my defenses up again.

“No,”  I told Benjamin.  “It’s a family dinner.  And he’s *not* family.  That would just be too…” and I couldn’t find the word.  Dad was standing nearby and inserted, “Premature.”

“Yeah,” I said, grateful for a word with thinking about it.

My brother, usually less tuned-in to these subtleties, objected strongly.  “I don’t like that word,” he said.  “It implies something.”

On Monday morning, my parents corralled me before I left for work and told me what Jay had done on Saturday, asking if I knew.  I felt a bit protective of Jay at this point and said he’d told me himself the same day.  “Dad just told him it was okay to ask,” my mom said.  “We didn’t tell him you would marry him.”  My dad said, “When I prayed with him that morning, I prayed for you both.  Separately.”

“He didn’t tell me anything different,” I said.  I began to wonder if I seemed like the type to get married just because I was told to.

As the actual time of the proposal drew near (I knew Jay was waiting on finding the right ring before he asked, so the actual moment was unknown.  Yes, it was nerve wracking), I grew more sure of my want to accept him.  My mom asked me why, and in one of my pathetic attempts to describe something I couldn’t put words to, I said, “Mom, he adores me.”

“If he’s not the one you’re supposed to marry, someone else *will* adore you!” she said earnestly.

~

Later on, once we were actually engaged, mom would occasionally ask me if I “really want to do this.”

“This is your last chance to back out,” she would remind me.

But once I said yes I was ready to walk down the aisle.  So these repeated questions became more like confirmation than anything that would shake me.  Recently I brought this up at a family dinner (Mom’s questioning my assurance through the engagement) and Dad brushed it off.

“She did the same thing with us,” he said. “Clear up to the wedding day.”

In March they broke 35 years (if I’m doing my math right) and on Sunday Jay and I will hit 8 years.

We’ve never doubted it was the perfect decision.

~

Then, of course, I ought to add my grandmother’s first words on learning we were engaged.

She had never before said anything one way or the other (she wasn’t the type to “mettle” or even offer her opinion before it was asked) but as soon as I told her we were decided she clapped her hands once and said, “I’m so glad you didn’t let him get away!”

The Decision

In my story “Sir” or Lord and “ma’am” or the title of Lady have been replaced by Frej (masculine) and Sarsé (feminine).  I’ve been asked why several times, and my best (if usually unsatisfactory) answer is that I find the variety of associations with the established words just too distracting.

A more acceptable answer to some might be that I like the quiet reminder alternate words give that you’re in another world.

Continue reading »

The Wicked Step-Mother

Can’t remember if I’ve said here before, but I’ve long thought that the “point” of the wicked step-mothers in so many stories was to be a warning all around:

  • To husbands: that they might think about how it affects their child(ren) when they remarry
  • To the women: that they would grow an antipathy for the injustice they hear in the stories
  • To the young girls: so they would understand that things could always be worse than with the mother they were born to.

Favorite Sports’ Simile

Usually I’m rolling my eyes at the sports’ commentators similes, as the speakers are so intense and seem to think they are so original.  And aren’t.

But this I loved (in reference to Olympic badminton), maybe it’s old to someone else, but it’s new to me:

Lands like a butterfly with sore feet.

Re-Vision #3

Well, patient readers, The novel has entered re-vision #3

This is (again, I suppose) very exciting to me.

I mentioned I was close to an ending, and was rightly encouraged by that proximity.  The difficulty (and nearly zero-productivity) following that awareness was simply an amplification of issues I’d been having since deciding to break the story into a series of sorts.

Several people counseled me to finish it anyway, just to have the… settledness of having something totally done, and I tried to follow this advice (remember that high productivity the other night?).  But even though I really liked what I wrote (when I have a lot to tell, the quality seems above average) I didn’t feel like it advanced the main story.

~

The original reason I was drawn to this tale (I believe I’ve mentioned at some point) was that it centered on a main character who got married part-way through the story.  I loved having a story that showed a working marriage and its themes of commitment and cooperation.

By breaking the story shortly after the marriage (my original plan once I stopped thinking of this as a single book), I was thwarting my own purpose and having to add material to places that were not as important to my original goals.

~

This third round uses material from both the previous drafts; in fact, my “starting place” on this draft is 207 pages and 53,734 words.

Using character (rather than time) to narrow the scope has allowed me not only to use material I have already written, but to tell the whole story in one place.

There is definitely still enough story to think about a second book, but it is disconnected enough from Linnea’s story that I feel it could be it’s own book without overlapping.  (It mainly follows the story of Runa, the character I quoted yesterday and mentioned in this post as one of my favorites.)

A reasonable comparison is the separate story-lines in the pairs of “books” in Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings: discrete adventures taking place in the same time.

I sketched out some chapters for Runa’s story and copied over what’s already written that fits in that new framework: 79 pages.

Can’t say yet whether it’s enough  to be it’s own story (too distracting to think about, honestly.  I’m trying to stay focused here). but it’s nice to reassure myself that the good work I’ve done isn’t *all* in the cut bits file.

How I make myself laugh

Just came across this exchange in my first rough draft.

Linnea (new wife of the former Lindorm): “I’m sorry, but I will have to cry for a moment.”
Kennett (ex-lindorm), growing distressed: “Cry? What’s this cry?”
Runa: “It is a visceral emotional response, generally more common among the females of our species and frequently regarded as cathartic.”

How Well do You Know Your Spouse?

Inspired-by (and based a bit on) this post, and the “game” currently popular at bridal showers.

How many of these do you know off the top of your head?

And I will say husband, because (I assume) I have so few male readers.  Prove me wrong, if you’re there.

  1. What’s your husband’s middle name?
  2. Did he have a nickname (from others? for himself?) while growing up?
  3. What’s his favorite color?
  4. What’s his favorite food?  (This should be easy if you cook for him.)
  5. What is he most-proud of?
  6. What’s his favorite outfit for you to wear?
  7. Do you know how he will vote?  (Will he vote?)
  8. What kind of toothpaste will your husband *not* use?
  9. What situation never fails to make him sick?
  10. What’s his favorite dessert?
  11. What was the last thing that made you laugh together?
  12. Have you ever seen your husband cry?  What caused it?  Was he embarrassed?
  13. Bonus: What was he wearing the last time you saw him?

I’m not asking any of you to answer these here, I just like them as ways of awareness: thinking about what I can remember, what I need to ask him (where is he at in this presidential mess?) and knowing how to please him (e.g. with my cooking-choices).

The “game” part of this puts the bride-to-be on the spot with whatever questions her maid of honor feels like springing on her.  For every question she gets wrong (MoH interviewed groom for answers) the happless– she always ends up hapless in my experience– bride has to drink another shot of something alcoholic or add another brick of bubblegum to her mouth.

She doesn’t usually get a choice: that’s pre-determined by the context of the shower.

Whose Will?

One thing I have struggled with in my parenting is the role of the “strong will.”

I have a strong will, I always have had (and my mother likes to say every child is a strong-willed child), so I really don’t feel threatened by examples of will in my children.

I like to say: “I’d rather deal with the challenges of a strong will now than the consequences of a weak will later.”

But being a fairly honest person I have to ask myself sometimes whether I’m making a decision to train their will or indulge my own.  Yes, it’s good to teach them to wait, but children are supposed to help their parents grow less-selfish too…

Many times the issue seems to come down to: Do I feed *their* self-centeredness or my own?

I have been praying about this off-and-on since last winter, and in Sunday school this morning I think I found a resolution.

We were talking about Jesus and how many times he made it clear he was not working from his own agenda, and someone read John 5:30.

The part I needed was, “My judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but him who sent me.”

This was what I needed, because I am so concerned with justice; fairness.  How could I know I was being just? I have to run it through this filter: Is this choice an effort to please God or to please myself?

Questioning

I read a handful of articles before sitting at the Right to Life booth yesterday afternoon.  The timing (I’d been sent them just that morning in an e-mail) was impeccable (thanks Becky) and as I thought on them, I started having imaginary conversations where I integrated the information I was assimilating.

Inevitably the “conversation” would veer into “personal” territory and (after one awkward– imaginary– ending) I established a policy: no personal questions in a public place.

It’s not that I am secretive (HA!) or that I’m not willing to offer myself as an illustration.  It’s mainly that answering one personal question gives permission to ask another and so on until you make another statement (by implication) at the point you quit answering. (The worship leader in this clip is a great example.)

~  ~  ~

In a similar way I think claiming to answer questions about God can become a “slippery slope,” because there is a point at which our human ability to explain or understand just fails, and part of faith is accepting that limitation.

~

Apparently there’s this big-selling, self-published book out there called The Shack.

I had never heard of it before Boundless started discussing it and its questionable theology a while back, but apparently it’s not going away and they have a new article up this week discussing the implications of a part of the book.  One of those is the idea we humans have the right to question God and call him into account about the stuff we don’t like (even Job– God’s “pet”— got an earful when he tried to insist on that).

To quote from the article, God’s not the Defendant, by Gary Thomas:

For 2,000 years, Christians have believed that God sent His Son because He put us on trial and found us wanting. The proper response of humans is, “I have sinned and fallen short of Your glory. Have mercy on me.” Today’s believer and non-believer is far more likely to respond, “There’s evil in the world; God, if You really exist, explain Yourself!”

As a man who has sinned and who continues to sin, how dare I judge God for allowing sin? To destroy all sin, He would have to destroy me, as I continue to sin on a daily basis. At the very least, He would have to remove all whispers of any notion of free will; and without free will, would I still be made in the image of God?

So many people who “question” (or accuse) God concerning evil assume that they are talking about something outside of themselves, either forgetting or never realizing that God doesn’t have a continuum of tolerances for the varieties of sin.

God’s mercy to the liar or coward requires the same provision from Him as his mercy to the abuser: the sacrifice of His son, Jesus.

I love how Thomas points out the sufficiency of God’s plan: how those who wish to leave their sin now have a way, how those who don’t want to change are also provided a place for eternity.

Continue reading »