Two Versions

Some of you may remember this version of the snake-confrontation (green segment at the bottom of a rambling, self-indulgent post).

In my current version, that scene gives too much weight/significance to Tykone, a relatively minor major character in this novel (more significant in the other story).

Instead of seeing it we hear him tell of it.  This breaks a number of “rules,” but it’s how things will stay for now.  This segment begins with Shimon, the palace herald, talking in the local tavern about what happened.

Continue reading »

Inoffensive Arguing

I think all of us here know the “rule” about using “I-statements” in arguments and discussions, rather than “you-statements.”

“I feel…” instead of “You’re *wrong*

I knew a guy in college that I once out-argued and he sputtered for a moment before collecting himself and sagely observing, “Well, you are un-wrong in that instance.”

I realized today that there are those for whom refraining from saying You’re wrong is not enough.  These people feel it’s part of the same, basic politeness for me to acknowledge their side has an equal legitimacy; an equal chance of being correct.

And if I’m being *really* polite I might hint the other person’s idea has the tiniest bit of upper hand because I’m less-open minded and perhaps might not notice if I were wrong.

Anyway, there are probably topics where this kind of exchange would be possible.  The problem is, I don’t think it would occur to me to discuss them, because I wouldn’t see them having a lot of significance.

There are things I will “go to the wall” on.  And while I won’t usually say that exact phrase without being asked, I am not going to pretend anything contradictory is of equal importance.  Even to be polite.

From My Earlier Novel

I am finding I am more private than I guessed.

These last weeks when I’ve been posting so little I’ve been slogging through some new thoughts and projects that I am uncertain of, and so feel no desire to write (publicly) about them.

And just because I’ve suddenly become…touchy about my current novel, I felt like showing a clip from an older work.  I’ve mentioned this one before, that it grew out of a single image from a dream.

Continue reading »

Curious Contradition

It is fascinating to me how we humans (perhaps I should specify Americans, as I can’t speak for other cultures) desire both to be unique, and also to be understood.

We desire both self-sufficiency and community; to not be alone.

Eventually, if we are to be sane, we have to settle on one side or the other of these ideas, because, truly, I don’t think they can cohabit.

The Things my Parents Said

Jay and I were, shall we say, far from effusive in public before we were married.

Mom said she wouldn’t have guessed we were that close to a proposal if I hadn’t been agonizing to her about my indecision.

So when Jay called the Saturday before Mother’s Day to ask if there were a time he could talk with my dad when I wasn’t around, well, she felt the need to give Dad a heads-up about what was coming.

She and I were out plant shopping for our garden when Jay asked my dad’s permission to propose.  Jay told me later the first thing my dad said was, “What do you think her answer will be?”

The next day my brother asked if I’d invited Jay to our Mother’s Day dinner.  Jay had told me the night before about his conversation with Dad, and I’d gotten all my defenses up again.

“No,”  I told Benjamin.  “It’s a family dinner.  And he’s *not* family.  That would just be too…” and I couldn’t find the word.  Dad was standing nearby and inserted, “Premature.”

“Yeah,” I said, grateful for a word with thinking about it.

My brother, usually less tuned-in to these subtleties, objected strongly.  “I don’t like that word,” he said.  “It implies something.”

On Monday morning, my parents corralled me before I left for work and told me what Jay had done on Saturday, asking if I knew.  I felt a bit protective of Jay at this point and said he’d told me himself the same day.  “Dad just told him it was okay to ask,” my mom said.  “We didn’t tell him you would marry him.”  My dad said, “When I prayed with him that morning, I prayed for you both.  Separately.”

“He didn’t tell me anything different,” I said.  I began to wonder if I seemed like the type to get married just because I was told to.

As the actual time of the proposal drew near (I knew Jay was waiting on finding the right ring before he asked, so the actual moment was unknown.  Yes, it was nerve wracking), I grew more sure of my want to accept him.  My mom asked me why, and in one of my pathetic attempts to describe something I couldn’t put words to, I said, “Mom, he adores me.”

“If he’s not the one you’re supposed to marry, someone else *will* adore you!” she said earnestly.

~

Later on, once we were actually engaged, mom would occasionally ask me if I “really want to do this.”

“This is your last chance to back out,” she would remind me.

But once I said yes I was ready to walk down the aisle.  So these repeated questions became more like confirmation than anything that would shake me.  Recently I brought this up at a family dinner (Mom’s questioning my assurance through the engagement) and Dad brushed it off.

“She did the same thing with us,” he said. “Clear up to the wedding day.”

In March they broke 35 years (if I’m doing my math right) and on Sunday Jay and I will hit 8 years.

We’ve never doubted it was the perfect decision.

~

Then, of course, I ought to add my grandmother’s first words on learning we were engaged.

She had never before said anything one way or the other (she wasn’t the type to “mettle” or even offer her opinion before it was asked) but as soon as I told her we were decided she clapped her hands once and said, “I’m so glad you didn’t let him get away!”

Questioning

I read a handful of articles before sitting at the Right to Life booth yesterday afternoon.  The timing (I’d been sent them just that morning in an e-mail) was impeccable (thanks Becky) and as I thought on them, I started having imaginary conversations where I integrated the information I was assimilating.

Inevitably the “conversation” would veer into “personal” territory and (after one awkward– imaginary– ending) I established a policy: no personal questions in a public place.

It’s not that I am secretive (HA!) or that I’m not willing to offer myself as an illustration.  It’s mainly that answering one personal question gives permission to ask another and so on until you make another statement (by implication) at the point you quit answering. (The worship leader in this clip is a great example.)

~  ~  ~

In a similar way I think claiming to answer questions about God can become a “slippery slope,” because there is a point at which our human ability to explain or understand just fails, and part of faith is accepting that limitation.

~

Apparently there’s this big-selling, self-published book out there called The Shack.

I had never heard of it before Boundless started discussing it and its questionable theology a while back, but apparently it’s not going away and they have a new article up this week discussing the implications of a part of the book.  One of those is the idea we humans have the right to question God and call him into account about the stuff we don’t like (even Job– God’s “pet”— got an earful when he tried to insist on that).

To quote from the article, God’s not the Defendant, by Gary Thomas:

For 2,000 years, Christians have believed that God sent His Son because He put us on trial and found us wanting. The proper response of humans is, “I have sinned and fallen short of Your glory. Have mercy on me.” Today’s believer and non-believer is far more likely to respond, “There’s evil in the world; God, if You really exist, explain Yourself!”

As a man who has sinned and who continues to sin, how dare I judge God for allowing sin? To destroy all sin, He would have to destroy me, as I continue to sin on a daily basis. At the very least, He would have to remove all whispers of any notion of free will; and without free will, would I still be made in the image of God?

So many people who “question” (or accuse) God concerning evil assume that they are talking about something outside of themselves, either forgetting or never realizing that God doesn’t have a continuum of tolerances for the varieties of sin.

God’s mercy to the liar or coward requires the same provision from Him as his mercy to the abuser: the sacrifice of His son, Jesus.

I love how Thomas points out the sufficiency of God’s plan: how those who wish to leave their sin now have a way, how those who don’t want to change are also provided a place for eternity.

Continue reading »

Predicting the Future as a Demonstration of Power

Writing to process an idea.

From Isaiah 41:22-23,

“Bring in your idols to tell us
what is going to happen.
Tell us what the former things were,
so that we may consider them
and know their final outcome.
Or declare to us the things to come,

tell us what the future holds,
so we may know that you are gods.
Do something, whether good or bad,
so that we will be dismayed and filled with fear.

My pastor’s sermon a while back introduced a new idea to my imagination:

Telling the future doesn’t have to be just some mystical, suspect, power.  It can also be a demonstration of power.

The idea is that anyone can accurately predict the future if they have the power to make that future happen.  Parents do this all the time.

You will go to school.  You will do your homework.  You will not see that movie.

The child’s free-will comes in to play, but the parents’ power frequently directs that will, and/or enforces the ultimate plan despite the child’s choices.

~ ~ ~

I remember an exchange my parents had about God’s omniscience.

“God is never surprised,” says one.  “He knows all things at all times.”

“Then why did God tell Abraham, ‘Now I know‘?” asked the other.

With this different angle of knowing the future, I can reconcile this question for myself.

Those things that God sent his prophets to say, those were God knowing the future, because he was directing it.  The smaller elements of individual free will would not disrupt his plan, and he left that to their choosing…

Something more to think about.  That’s all.

What is a *Reader*?

This started as a comment to Bluestocking’s answer to a question, and got, well, long, so I moved it here and it got longer.  I don’t do the meme she’s responding to, but it got me thinking and writing…. so there you go.

I must have a… gentler definition of “reader,” most likely because I wish to include myself in the categorization.

I think anyone who loves to read, can get lost in a story, can draw connections between stories, and between stories and life, can be described as a Reader (with a capital R, since I understand this isn’t a discussion of mere ability).

Now, I’ve never tried reading “chick lit” or “romance” much, but I believe there are smart people who write both, and they write well and what they know will sell (part of being smart and making a living.)

Should one argue, from experience or stereotype, that those genres are “shallow,” that would be irrelevant even if it were true.  If it provides an alternate world, an escape, and builds a vascular system (i.e. those connections I tried to allude to above), it has served its purpose: both to entertain and cause the reader(s) to think.

I’ve just started reading a textbook (for pleasure.  Yes, I was the kid who curled up with encyclopedias): A Critical Handbook of Children’s Literature, by Rebecca J. Lukens, and I love how she talks about “classics.”

The sacred terms “classic” and “award-winner” frequently get us into trouble.  Perhaps it is wise to remember how as children we were sometimes bored by the classics of our parents’ generation.

I’ve mentioned a couple times how some of my favorite books would have no chance of getting published if they were submitted this century, and that I have never been able to work up the interest in some of the most basic “cannon” of femininity (namely, Austen, Alcott and the Little House series).

Continue reading »

How hard is too hard?

When I asked Jay whether I should quit something because it was hard, I expected a resounding No.

His answer:

That depends on whether it is required or rewarding.  If it is neither there’s no reason to keep doing it.

This is the rocket scientist I married.

And, no, that wasn’t sarcastic.  It was something I needed very much to hear, making me revisit motivation and find new encouragement there.

I don’t know about any of you, readers, but I have this image of quitting as bad in and of itself.  I suppose it’s a cousin to the feeling bad about saying No.

Learn to say no. It will be of more use to you than to be able to read Latin.

–Charles Spurgeon

Sometimes I think I say no too easially, and it makes me look/feel like the “difficult” person, but other than that (though sometimes that is no small thing) I’ve never regretted saying no.

It’s Growing.

Well, I’m up to 8 chapters “finished” out of 16 (yes, the number of chapters has gone up, too) to 1st-draft standards.

To combat my inner editor I’ve been making notes about what I need to clean up the next time around.

For example,

Chapter 7, The Fitting:

  • Focus on narrowing POV and keeping it consistent.
  • Eliminate any simpering or mooning over each other.  Keep this as close to a “business” relationship as possible, otherwise, we can’t believe Torb’s not a jerk in Chapter 9.

He’s really not, and imagining he is doesn’t advance the story.

  • clarify queen’s attitude toward MC
  • Clarify her relationship with her son

Now for a complete change of pace I need to sit down and decide what I’m doing with a dozen 2 to 6-year-olds for an hour tomorrow.