What is a Man?

Okay, so I can’t not-opine.

There is this idea out there that a woman’s brain turns to mush when deprived of adequate adult interaction and stimulation (Read: “You sucker Stay-at-home-moms are gonna go stupid”).
If that is true of some, it isn’t of me.
More often the danger for my brain is explosion.

Writing lets off a bit of the pressure so I don’t say as many un-thought-out things in real-life.

Like yesterday, when I randomly gushed some vague, meaningless mush about how proud I was of a fellow who’s moved out of boyhood and become a man. (My toes curl just thinking about how stupid that had to sound.)

Poor dears didn’t even do anything to deserve it– I just had a few to many thoughts swirling around and the extra escaped in a blur.

(My apologies, M and A, if you’re reading this. Usually my random attacks of thought are much more organized.)

~ ~ ~

So, since it was in my mind enough to spill out, I wanted to see if I could organize these thoughts.

What do I mean by a man? (Again, this is not a thesis, only random thoughts– lest anyone expect too much).

  • A male (let’s start with the basics ;) )
  • Someone who has begun thinking beyond himself
  • Someone who is working at making that style of thought paramount
  • Someone who is using that others-focused thinking to direct his behavior
  • Someone whose decision to benefit someone else is not based on receiving a reward

When we (mostly women, mostly when we were single– I hope) complain about a guy needing to “grow up,” we’re usually talking about one of these (last four) things.

“Oh Lord, help me forgive those who sin differently than I do.”

Have you ever noticed how easy it is to be incensed over certain sins?

As football season was starting there was flap about the player involved in dog fights, and my husband (not the least bit sentimental over animals for various reasons) asked what the big deal was.

That is, he knew why people didn’t like dog fighting, but was asking why this particular fall from grace was drawing more vehement and widespread criticism than any of the other stupid and sinful things public figures are exposed as being involved in.

In my typical way I launched into an off-the-cuff explanation as though it were a prepared speech. It went something like this:

Dog-fighting is something it’s safe not to like. It’s been reduced to a fringe activity in recent days, so you can be outraged and unrestrained in your criticism without having to worry about offending or provoking defensiveness in any of your acquaintances.

Or, even if you did, you’d feel on high moral ground that you wouldn’t be threatened by their disagreement. Nothing they can say would make you weaken your stance.

Anyway, people will rarely pass up a chance to look superior.

Other things, like a temper, say, or adultery, lying or arrogance– all these touch much more widely and deeply in our “civilized” world.

People get a “who are you to throw the first stone?” mentality, or (to invoke another stone cliché) realize they’re probably living in a glass house, and so refrain from throwing stones.

I don’t know enough about football to know how good a player Michael Vick is, so I don’t know how seriously to take it when commentators say he’ll have a hard time getting reemployed. They make out that it’s the league “taking this offense seriously” and I think more than that it’s a “rising star”(to quote one article) who hasn’t risen fast enough to make owners/coaches/whoever think he’s good enough to be worth the bad press.

I don’t know if I’m defending him or not– I just know that all I could think of was a quote I read recently:

Stephen Covey was asked after a speech about how to forgive someone who has committed adultery. He said the question made him think of the old prayer, “Oh Lord, let me forgive those who sin differently than I do.”

We are all in need of redemption (I wrote a post earlier about wanting to understand or redeem the villain reflecting an understanding of evil in our own hearts), and we shouldn’t try to fool ourselves that one sin is less of a stench in God’s nostrils than another.

Dad Got a Moose!

Speaking of provision (because I so often do)…

My father is an elementary school teacher, so he doesn’t get much time to hunt (teachers only have 2 days of personal leave). He goes out over Labor Day weekend, and sometimes on another weekend or two, but usually he can’t go hunt.

Even so, God has nearly every year provided meat, either through a shared kill, an antlerless hunt permit or by a call from someone we know on the edge or just outside of town, saying there’s a moose in their garden or back yard.

My father hunts with a bow, so he can hunt in places a gun hunt (i.e. residential areas) wouldn’t be allowed.

Now, this being Alaska, we really do have “neighborhood moose” wandering around various subdivisions. I remember one sleeping outside my window when I was in high school.

My old (as in, arthritic and going blind) dog once rushed one when she thought it was going to hurt my mom. Got kicked really good, too. Usually there’s less drama.

Yesterday’s seminar talked a lot about “hidden rules” that exist in different groups (the main focus there was economic levels), and how easily relationship can be damaged or destroyed by unknowingly violating these hidden rules.

I was trying to think of hidden rules that serious in my own community. Serious enough to damage relationship (there are many unspoken “understandings,” but most of them just reveal if someone is assimilated Alaskan or fresh from Outside). I’ve only thought of one so far:

You never shoot the neighborhood moose. I only remember one time when a neighborhood moose was killed, and there was so much outrage you never would have guessed we’re a hunting community.

So Dad never stepped outside and shot a moose on his own property, because we always lived in a neighborhood. He knew the “rule.”

But he lives now in my grandparents’ house. It’s still in town, but not in a neighborhood, so when he went outside last night and saw a moose he was free to grab his bow. It took some tracking (and my mom drove the Subaru to where it finally fell), but with the neighbors’ help they got it all cut up and hung in the garage by 1:30 this morning.

God is so faithful to provide.

How do we see past *now*?

I figured out why I buy so many books, and why I bring home these ridiculously large piles (or bags) from the Library. And I found it in a Robert Frost poem.

Many People Are familiar with “The Road not Taken,” particularly the last two lines:

I took the one less traveled by,
and that has made all the difference.

What caught my mind more this reading was the end of the third stanza:

Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back.

This is why. This feeling that once you leave something behind you are nearly choosing to be wholly done with it.

Because of this, I will sometimes take hold of more (be they ideas, activities or books,) than I can reasonably consume, just because I feel half panicy that I may never return if I pass it by.

I need to start asking myself what I’d really lose if I never came back. I’ve lived without it until now, right? Right?

I suppose I’m revealing an undisciplined nature here, since, at least in theory, I shouldn’t have to utterly give up anything, just re-time it. But despite my attempts to remember otherwise, I sometimes still get fixated on now.

Jay and I were discussing this, and we decided that the main challenge comes from having no track record. After all, the first two-thirds of our lives were spent understanding and keeping up with short-term goals.

What is Hope? Where does it come from?

Random thoughts. Not a thesis.

My pastor suggested Sunday (while touching on the relationship between hope and faith) that hope (like faith) is evidenced by action.

And that got me thinking.

Hope is not a passive thing.

It is active. Whether we really hope may be shown by what we do.

It is also a type of dependency. We’re hanging on something outside ourselves (and probably outside of our control, or we would have made it happen already).

In contrast, despair is really a type of arrogance.

I’ve never heard a better definition than Gandolf’s in The Lord of the Rings: “Despair is for those who see the end beyond all doubt.”

It claims a completeness within one’s self, then is crushed when (surprise!) that source becomes inadequate for the task at hand.

Despair only reveals the smallness of the one despairing, and probably a lack of humility to look outside to greater resources.

When I was in high school I was taught that people once believed it was the eye that lit up what is saw.

Just now I cannot imagine how anyone could actually have believed this, considering the size of the eye, and what it supposedly illuminated (and the limitations of night and day…).

But taking it as an idea, I feel this is a good analogy/reminder about hope:

Hope is not something we produce. It is like light to the eye. The eye does not illuminate, it opens to receive illumination.

When we acknowledge our need and look outside ourselves (especially when we look to God) we are no longer limited to our own resources, and I think that is what enables us to hope.

Caribou pix (fears about the ANWR herd are a joke)

As in, pictures from family.Next to the Garden

My mother-in-law took these this week. There have been thousands of caribou moving through their property lately.

About to be Overrun

Made me think of two things:

  • This must be what the bison herds were like hundreds of years ago.
  • Anyone who says the oil industry is hard on caribou (*cough* ANWR *cough*) can’t be looking at the caribou near other oil fields.

(Hard on birds is more accurate, but that’s already been ignored for a recent set-up that went unopposed, as far as I know.)

In the Front Yard

Cultural Memory

These thoughts are all very embryonic, so I’d be interested in any more ideas or refining of these if anyone wants to add to them.

~

Finding a book this weekend has sparked a whole new train of thought for me.

I bought it because I am connected to Belarus (per a comment by my father some years ago about his grandfather), and I was curious what kinds of tales were “mine.”

The results have been fascinating.

Some ordinary folktale elements that have always seemed silly to me (non sequiturs, not recognizing people you’ve met before, not following life-saving directions) are less common. Haven’t found them yet, actually.

It feels exciting in a strange way– making me wonder if my preferences might have been shaped somehow by a cultural construct that was already in the stories of my roots.

What if I felt no need to reshape them because they pleased me, but I was pleased by them because they shaped the thoughts and lives of forgotten ancestors?

The idea is that I might actually like these stories because they developed under the same preferences I was (perhaps) born with.

~

Now, what I find so intriguing is this idea of preferences being somehow genetic.

I read once that most people’s favorite colors are colors that look good on them. Shades that are attractive with their coloring.

As looks are easily accepted as genetically directed ;-) I extrapolate from this that favorite colors are, too some extent, also.

If you once accept that this one preference could have genetic roots, it opens all kinds of possibilities.

It does, of course, bring in the question of nature vs nurture, but it also delights my imagination to think there could be some kind of “memory” deep in me, connecting me to people and ways of thinking that I’ve been generations removed from.

Pedantic and Pushy

As someone who has worked most of my sentient life to be more gentle and responsive (mainly because I had such a long road to walk in this area) I have always been a bit sensitive to the label of being pushy or bossy.

(This, of course, presupposes I wasn’t attempting to be either at the time of the observation.)

I don’t want to be rude, but I do want to be understood, and as long as I have the energy I won’t pretend to agree or it that doesn’t matter, when there’s a dispute of fact or emotional honesty.

If any reader has not heard me say it before, I strongly believe silence (in the vast majority of cases) is seen as agreement. Even permission.

If someone makes a joke at your expense and you don’t voice that it bothers you, watch out– you’ve tacitly given approval for that to repeat.

So when I’m trying to communicate something, I don’t (usually) like to quit before my point is made.

Tonight’s point, courtesy my gradually increasing awareness of Belarus: Belarus is distinct from Russia.

I was talking with someone about my story and she kept referring to the story as Russian. I protested/corrected that the right name was Belorussian (or some variant on that).

And in four or five iterations on a theme I continued insisting, no, they are not, and haven’t been, and are distinct, in their own culture, and background, from Russia.

“I’m not trying to be pushy,” I said, feeling horribly embarrassed to be arguing after so little time spent researching, but convinced and not ready to back down.

My interlocutor didn’t say she thought I was pushy (Mom did, though she clarified later that wasn’t bad). The woman did call me pedantic.

Not that that’s better, as the topic was already narrow and I hope I wasn’t “ostentatious.”

Why does this matter to me so much? I had to ask myself. And the answer came out more emotionally charged than I expected.

I have alway felt heartache for Korea– I know little about its now but I’m a bit more familiar with its past because of my folktale collecting. Best as I can tell it has been almost continually occupied or “influenced.” Many times horribly oppressed, it somehow maintained its own ethnic identity.

I had made the parallel leap to Belarus– though I’m sure it’s not unique in this position of maintaining identity through continued oppression.

If I didn’t already have the emotional connection to Korea, maybe it wouldn’t have mattered so much, but I did, so I just couldn’t let it go.

Finally, far past wishing the conversation was over, but feeling the point needed to be clear, I said, “Belarus is the European Korea. You can’t call it Russia any more than you can call Korea China or Japan because of their occupation or control.”

~

C.S. Lewis in his Mere Christianity argued that no impulse is utterly good or bad, some just need curbing more often than others, resulting in a negative label.

With both mother-love and sexual impulses there are situations where an excess is unhealthy, but that doesn’t make the impulses themselves wicked.

In a similar way “pedanticism” and pushiness more often than many other things must be curbed, resulting in my assumption that they are bad.

While discussing the incident with my mom later that evening she reminded me that, really, sometimes you need to be pushy to get something done.

I needed to be pushy because it was important to me, to be understood.

I appreciated her helping me think through this, because I’m still learning the maturity to evaluate the less-desirable behaviors and decide when they are appropriate.

No doubt there was, somewhere, a more mature way of handling the conflict that arose this evening. But as things fell out, my mind is now working in new directions, and I’ve usually found that to be healthy.

And, often, this opening of a new way of thinking becomes a training ground for the real-stakes event. Something where I have to know how to apply what I’ve learned.

Kind-of turns up the pressure to be an attentive student…

Growing through 2 Peter 1:5-8

This actually came up in Sunday School several weeks ago, but I was thinking of it again and wanted to share it.

In 2 Peter chapter 1, the author reminds us that God’s “divine power has given us everything required for life and godliness,” then goes on to list a progression:

Make every effort to supplement your faith with goodness, goodness with knowledge, knowledge with self-control, self-control with endurance, endurance with godliness, godliness with brotherly affection, and brotherly affection with love.

As the mother of young children who’ve made a confession of faith, I suddenly saw this differently than I had before.

I saw this as a list of spiritual development paralleling stages of natural development.

The girls have each made a confession of faith, so that is their starting place. In this new context, with the Spirit’s help, they are now learning goodness.

As a few more years go by their main occupation will become their schooling (adding knowledge). Then, I see this exponentially applying to the adolescent years, they add in increased self-control.

As a young adult (I want to say especially as a young parent) we add endurance, because I think we never truly learn how much we can be stretched until “child(ren)” happens to us.

I see godliness as something we all are working toward, but that we see most consistently in, well, in people older than me.

As a tendency to base the majority of your behaviors off of obedience to a very clear understanding of what God would have us do, I see godliness as something that takes a bit of familiarity with the Word and sensitivity to God’s leading in your life.

Something, in short, most visible with spiritual maturity.

And to finish with the brotherly kindness and love, I think this is the natural progression of our interaction with others. Initially (and this is where I’m at in teaching my children right now), we choose to be kind, because it’s the right, God-honoring thing to do.

Ultimately, we want everything we do to be motivated by love.

When we are genuinely doing everything out of a pure love, that, I believe is the measure of maturity.

Write Like a Man

Kaye introduced me to The Gender Genie a while back and I thought some visitors here might be interested in my results.

I tested my novel (the opening chapters at least) and they came back accurately guessed to be written by a female. So, as there was a “blog post” catigory, I started playing with random posts to check the genie’s continued accuracy.

I found the results interesting, and possibly inflammatory, depending on who wants to interpret them.

The personal story/relational ones I checked came back with the guess they were written by a female:

And my analytical/practical advice stuff came back with the guess it was written by a male:

ETA: I checked a number of my male-centered Tuesday Tales and these also came back as male-written.

I find this somewhat gratifying, maybe for the same reason no woman wants to hear “You throw like a girl,” when playing a sport with men.

Going beyond basic politeness, I like to be able to hold my own and prove myself a reasonably competent participant on the neutral terms (i.e., by the rules) even if they might be a bit skewed to begin with (we all know that the strongest man will always be stronger than the strongest woman).

And I’m speaking literally here, so, please, nobody pick a fight. I’ll ignore it. ;)