I cried at the end.
Seriously.
I know I have more readers than comment, so here’s a question for everyone:
Can you give me any titles of books where a character has a disability of some kind, but the book is not about that disability?
Just now I can only think of two:
The interaction of everyone with Chris was very revealing of character, but wasn’t the point of he story. That was bigger than just one person.
These are the types of stories I’m looking for: Disability is a part of who they are, but it doesn’t drive the whole story (like, say, What’s Wrong With Timmy?)
If you have any ideas, please leave a comment and point me in that direction.
Thanks!
Was gone much of the last week for our last (immediate) family wedding.
Random “over-heards” from the weekend:
A tee-shirt on the groom:
No, I don’t have a girlfriend.
But a know a girl who would be pretty upset if she heard me say that.After the wedding:
60-something uncle: So, [Groom] what are you planning on doing tonight?
Unbelieving stare from groom.
40-something uncle: Has it really been that long since you were married?Of course the question was more about where they were spending their honeymoon than what they’d be doing.
And then there was the one on the drive home where my oldest asked,
Are we going to Fairbanks and real-Alaska, now?
And here we are, at almost 1400 miles of driving in less than a month, five in the Subaru Legacy.
Do we look a little dazed to you?
Now, Lord willing, my goal is to really set up house and find a balance now that sickness, dog (yes, dog :( ) and crazy-fast weekends across the state are over for the present.
Speaking of precision, I’ve found it spills into my prayer-life as well.
I order my emotions (gratitude, desires, concerns) into words, present them to God, then wonder how people fill an hour praying about only one thing…
The men’s Sunday school class at church is studying Mark, so I’m sure Nate (who is teaching the class) had this in mind when he wrote in an e-mail:
And remember: If your high speed Internet connection causes you to stumble, cut the wire. It’s better for you to enter life with dial-up than have 10 Mbps but end up floating face down in the sewer.
A bear-trainer and his animal were lost in a blowing storm and begged shelter at the only cabin they could find in the mountains.
The householder did not seem at all frightened by the enormous bear but tremblingly warned the trainer that all the trolls of the hill were coming to his house that night– as they did each year– to eat him nearly out of house and home.
“And if I can’t stop them from starving me to bones, how can I offer you safety?”
The trainer assured the old man he’d look after his own safety if only he had a roof over his head, and the householder allowed him in.
As soon as he had laid out on the table all the food he had, the skinny old man climbed into the loft to hide. The trainer had his bear lie down behind the stove, and sat down beside it himself, to thaw the ice from his fingers and toes.
An hour before midnight the front door blew open and in came a swarm of wrinkly-skinned trolls, gray as the mountain and tall as the trainer’s waist.
Without seeming to notice him, they fell on the food at the table, quickly consuming a mound larger than their whole group. A young troll, satisfied sooner than the others, was playing with a long sausage in the fire when he noticed the bear behind the stove.
“Does kitty want a sausage?” he shrieked, poking the bear’s nose with the burning meat.
The bear rushed out with a roar and chased all the screaming trolls from the cabin. When another troll, larger than the rest, peeked in the door, the trainer called, “Sic ’em,” and the bear got rid of that one too.
A year later, the old man was working outdoors when a single troll asked from behind a rock, “Have you still got that big kitty, master?”
“Oh yes,” said the old man, thinking quickly. “And she’s had seven kittens since then.”
“Then you’ll never have us back for guests!” said the troll.
And the old man never did see them again.
Random thoughts. Not a thesis.
My pastor suggested Sunday (while touching on the relationship between hope and faith) that hope (like faith) is evidenced by action.
And that got me thinking.
Hope is not a passive thing.
It is active. Whether we really hope may be shown by what we do.
It is also a type of dependency. We’re hanging on something outside ourselves (and probably outside of our control, or we would have made it happen already).
In contrast, despair is really a type of arrogance.
I’ve never heard a better definition than Gandolf’s in The Lord of the Rings: “Despair is for those who see the end beyond all doubt.”
It claims a completeness within one’s self, then is crushed when (surprise!) that source becomes inadequate for the task at hand.
Despair only reveals the smallness of the one despairing, and probably a lack of humility to look outside to greater resources.
When I was in high school I was taught that people once believed it was the eye that lit up what is saw.
Just now I cannot imagine how anyone could actually have believed this, considering the size of the eye, and what it supposedly illuminated (and the limitations of night and day…).
But taking it as an idea, I feel this is a good analogy/reminder about hope:
Hope is not something we produce. It is like light to the eye. The eye does not illuminate, it opens to receive illumination.
When we acknowledge our need and look outside ourselves (especially when we look to God) we are no longer limited to our own resources, and I think that is what enables us to hope.
My flesh and my heart may fail, but God is the strength of my heart and my portion forever.
Psalm 73:26
Jacques Barzun in A Writer’s Discipline:
[We] transfer a part of our intellectual and emotional insides into an independent and self-sustaining outside [when we write]. It follows that if we have any doubts about the strength, truth, or beauty of our insides, the doubt acts as an automatic censor which quietly forbids the act of exhibition.
My mother-in-law took these this week. There have been thousands of caribou moving through their property lately.
Made me think of two things:
(Hard on birds is more accurate, but that’s already been ignored for a recent set-up that went unopposed, as far as I know.)